Martin Fowler explains his discomfort with an identifiable LLM style and his preference for drafting in his own words. His central concern is preserving writing as a way to develop thoughts and express personal experience and judgment, rather than identifying AI authorship from surface features. Outlining, translation and accessibility assistance can warrant different treatment. A related essay emphasizes practitioners’ experience and accountability in their writing. Both are arguments about practice, not evidence that particular phrases reliably prove AI use.