Trakkr asked five AI assistants 200 questions and traced 1,285 statistical citations through up to five pages. It found that 40% matched an original study, 8% changed a number or its meaning, and 40% could not be accessed or verified. A page containing a number was not necessarily its original source. This was a snapshot of a particular question set, and unverifiable does not mean false. Assistants can repeat the same citation chain, so consequential figures require checking the underlying population, date and definition.
Back to Tech
Tracing the original research behind AI statistics
Agreement among assistants did not guarantee independent evidence.