FlokiNET says it refused a ZeroFox request to remove a site identifying immigration-enforcement personnel because it considered the material useful for public accountability. It acknowledged that the data came from a breach without the individuals’ consent. The provider says CentralNic nevertheless applied serverHold to the original domain, interrupting access before the site returned through another registrar. The sequence shows that a host’s refusal does not guarantee availability. It is not a court ruling on legality or personal risk, but raises questions about identifying the responsible requester and legal basis for removal demands.